Saturday, 7 August 2010

MORE THAN NEIGHBOURS

By MICHAEL FIELD - Sunday Star Times

Fiji and Papua New Guinea leaders have attacked New Zealanders as people not of the Pacific. Journalist and author Michael Field reflects on being a Kiwi in Pasifika.

WHEN I first met Michael Somare, it was one of those rare moments when he wasn't prime minister of the country he largely created, Papua New Guinea.

I was among crowds stuck at an airport in Madang in 2004, on PNG's northern Bismarck Sea coast. In the always interesting world of PNG, we were going nowhere because a wheel had fallen off the plane.

Among the crowd were a group of old, sweating white men, some with the slouch hat of the Australian Infantry Corps that several decades before had fought the Japanese nearby.

As PNG's founding prime minister at independence in 1975, Somare had a long struggle against Canberra. That hot Madang afternoon he went out of his way, pulling strings and using influence, caring for the old diggers.

Thirty-five years on, Grand Chief Sir Michael, now back as prime minister, is an irritable, bitter 74-year-old, given to thinking he has a divine right to rule the country of seven million people, nearly twice the size of New Zealand.

Somare has taken to seeing Fiji's military bully Voreqe Bainimarama as the new hope for Melanesia.

Last month Bainimarama hosted a poorly attended "Friends of Fiji" summit at Natadola. While the formal Melanesian Spearhead Group pulled out, Somare showed up, supporting Bainimarama's petulant attack on Canberra.

"I don't consider Australia and New Zealand as Pacific island people," Somare said, as if that justified anything.

By his definition Samoa did not make the cut either – it's seen as under New Zealand influence.

Only two days before disclaiming on race, Somare had stood in front of a fellow member of the PNG parliament, Sam Basil, and said, "If you were outside, I would kill you."

Last week Bainimarama, in a striking interview with the ABC during which he wore a red triangular party hat, supported the Somare theme, saying New Zealanders and Australians should be excluded from the Forum as they were "not Pacific islanders".

"They [Australians and New Zealanders] crept in slowly like the proverbial camel, you know, with their head in, and then the front legs, and then the back legs, and all of a sudden the owners of the tent were out and they were inside the tent," he said.

As a journalism student in Wellington, I nearly ended up at the inaugural meeting of the premier regional institution, the South Pacific Forum, held in the Maori Affairs Room at parliament on August 5-7, 1971.

Australia and New Zealand attended, along with newly independent Fiji, the Cook Islands, Nauru, Tonga and (as it was then) Western Samoa.

Their modest four-page communique (last year's Forum communique was 25 pages long) referred to a "private and informal discussion of a wide range of issues of common concern".

On top of their agenda were French nuclear tests in French Polynesia. It remained the top matter until 1996; then the Pacific found it had little in common.

The new spirit between New Zealand and the Pacific was soon revealed as a sham when in 1973 the Labour government of Norman Kirk began dawn raids on Pacific Island migrants. It went unnoticed until National's prime minister, Robert Muldoon, cranked them up and even rounded up Maori and made them prove they had the right to be here.

I had just come back from Africa where I had worked as a volunteer in the Kalahari to discover this parody talking about letting white Rhodesians into New Zealand – but not Polynesians or blacks – because they were "kith and kin".

I launched into the story, as did many reporters around the country, and the Evening Post published on its front page my accounts of outrageous behaviour by police and immigration officials. There were many meetings; decades later I can go past the Newtown Primary School hall in Wellington and recall the hundreds of Pacific Islanders who gathered there, feeling fearful and deeply hurt.

I JOINED VOLUNTEER Service Abroad (VSA) at the age of 23 because it offered a cure for persistent wanderlust by paying my airfare and giving me a job, house and adventure.

Rather than getting me to do useful things like digging wells, teaching the illiterate or curing leprosy, VSA put me on the staff of Samoa's prime minister, Tupuola Efi.

The department tea-lady offered me board with her policeman husband and her large family, which included at least three teenage maidens.

I went with Margaret Mead, the great American anthropologist – or at least her book, Coming of Age in Samoa.

Written in 1928, it got Americans believing that Samoan teenagers were relaxed and happy in their free love; and if they could do it, so could everybody else. I explained all this to the girls, but slowly it dawned on me that Mead was wrong. She then died. A telex machine clattered with demands for grief-stricken tributes from happy natives. Tupuola said no.

Delegations pounded their way up a narrow wooden staircase to the landing outside my office; they were horrified that the prime minister was not showing suitable respect to Earth Mother. It was not that Tupuola thought she was better off dead. He just did not want to glorify a woman who had libelled Samoans for decades.

While I was in the PM's Department, the consequences of the dawn raids coloured relations with New Zealand. Muldoon would show up, sometimes at just half a day's notice using a Civil Aviation calibration flight, and hector Tupuola in an, at times, colonial fashion.

Tupuola (who is now Head of State Tupua Tamasese Tupuola) told me he did not mind; he saw Muldoon as a lonely and friendless man who would benefit from fa'a Samoa.

Like most of my generation, the colonial history of Samoa was largely a blank sheet.

Tupuola went to the United Nations in 1976, as the world reeled at the scenes coming out of apartheid South Africa's Soweto. When he said Samoa understood the pain of the black community because Samoa had gone through it too, many New Zealanders in Apia objected that Tupuola was being extravagant.

We used the government newspaper Savali to give some historical context to Tupuola's remarks and, to my embarrassment, I found a story I knew nothing of – and had certainly not been taught in school. It was of a pacifist movement, the Mau, and the young Tupua Tamasese Lealofi III, the prime minister's uncle.

In 1929 a New Zealand policeman had shot and killed him as he stood unarmed in the street, calling for peace. Seven others were killed too. Under New Zealand's careless rule, 25% of Samoa's people died in a month in 1918 from influenza.

All this had been forgotten. I produced a book in 1984 that drew a deeply emotional response from Samoans. The Mau story had largely gone unrecorded, other than in song. New Zealand was a bit slower to deal with it, and it wasn't until 2002 that Prime Minister Helen Clark apologised for the appalling tragedy.

Perhaps up to that point, Somare could have got away with his line that we are not a Pacific people, although I would have never accepted it. As a school boy, I had Fijian rugby billets staying with us. I knew their world was mine too.

A COUPLE OF years ago I was in Tokelau, New Zealand's last territory, sitting on the malae of the tiny Fakaofo Atoll.

I count that warm, calm evening as a moksha moment – release from the Anglo-centric New Zealand world to that of the Pacific. Small white terns, flitting in and out of breadfruit trees, enhanced their intense greens. Into the space, as the sun sets, the kids get together to play. It looked informal, and quickly games of touch rugby, volleyball and netball were under way. What made it different was that all the games were taking place at the same time, on the same small space. Games passed through each other as if the other didn't exist; it was a tribute to the concept of sharing.

Too many New Zealanders believe that Pacific Islanders are dependent on our taxes and that, without us, they would simply fail to survive. They should be grateful, in other words.

It is not the case. Tokelau – and Samoa, the Cooks and the other Pacific islands – have much that they can contribute to creating a region that will never quite be paradise, but will certainly offer a vision of a better world.

The definitive moment that proves Somare is wrong was in last year's tsunami in Samoa. I reported on the tragedy, conscious of my family connections to many of the places hurt by the waves. I am not alone in this – thousands of people in New Zealand and Australia now have family in Samoa.

It was a little more than that, though, for New Zealand had found in that tragedy a sense of a wider Pacific community that it was part of.

This was no disaster to some Third World country. Call me hopelessly romantic, but I believe the Robert Muldoon New Zealand petered out and disappeared. People, for a whole lot of reasons, got on with creating a new Pacific vision. This is not some advertising jingle or warm fuzzies; it was tested in the tsunami and it worked.

Two days after the tsunami I was standing on a devastated Upolu beach.

Prime Minister John Key was trying to find someone on his phone – some way to get help.

It wasn't a politically affected gesture; it was too small amidst the death then to worry about, but like thousands of other New Zealanders the idea was to give aid and help as soon as possible.

In 1929, New Zealand politicians had their police shoot and kill unarmed Samoans on the streets of Apia. Exactly 80 years later, New Zealand ran to Samoa's side to give aid. We all change and learn, of course, but what I like about this is that despite the mess New Zealand made, Samoans came, changed us and became part of us.

And Grand Chief Somare; sorry, but we are Pacific Islanders, and we're all in this together.

Michael Field is the author of Swimming With Sharks: Tales from the South Pacific frontline, published by Penguin

Friday, 6 August 2010

CANCER IN THE NATIONAL FISHERIES AUTHORITY; A FISHY AFFAIR

By Countryside

My dear grandmother died of thyroid cancer and it was ghastly. Her tender body rapidly deteriorated and because the cancer had closed her mouth, the only way to feed her was to drill a hole through her stomach and for to breathe, another through her throat. She had it bad and her odor was very strong, almost similar to putrification. It was advanced and after 6 months, she went home to be with the lord.

You see cancer is a class of diseases in which a group of cells display uncontrolled growth (division beyond the normal limits), invasion (intrusion on and destruction of adjacent tissues), and sometimes metastasis (spread to other locations in the body via lymph or blood). These three malignant properties of cancers differentiate them from benign tumors, which are self-limited, and do not invade or metastasize.

Most cancers form a tumor but some, like leukemia, do not. Cancers are caused by abnormalities in the genetic material of the transformed cells. These abnormalities may be due to the effects of carcinogens, such as tobacco smoke, radiation, chemicals, or infectious agents. Other cancer-promoting genetic abnormalities may randomly occur through errors in DNA replication, or are inherited, and thus present in all cells from birth. The heritability of cancers is usually affected by complex interactions between carcinogens and the host's genome.

The National Fisheries Authority display cancer type symptoms, Corruption. Designed to manage and facilitate our fisheries resources, it has become a club for the big boys in the fisheries industry. It has uncontrollable growth of mismanagement, it invades like metastasi where the entire fisheries sector is affected by its chaotic feat and at the end, tragically like my grandmother, it is killing the people of Papua New Guinea.

Having negotiated various treaties for the government of PNG with competent, passionate PNGns, (who have all but left because of this filth), I am quite perplexed at the current state of affairs in our fisheries negotiations. Driven by private sector radicals that care absolutely nothing about our people, they have used the kumul flag to profiteer their cause. Locking in deals with Asia, the EU and many others. Tragically, these arrangements grossly undervalues our resource and people. Our access agreements are at best, access fees and the NFA has not been able to use these opportunities to demand socio – economic programmes to develop our people. The miracles of the Fisheries College, coastal programmes are all aid money and nothing from the access agreements.

You see for this cancer to sustain itself, it needs to invade and like the corruption in the regulatory services in the US Financial System, the NFA Managing Director is an industry man and wantoks, he’s been rewarded well. I’ve watched this man singlehandedly scream down his enforcement officers that were trying to lay charges on a major industry player for demanding them to improve their facilities as they are hazardous for both employees and food safety. In another incident, spending millions of kina to pursue an unrealistic agenda internationally, that was fueled by wanabee saviors of the fisheries sector. Indeed the smell of putrification is overwhelming and they are indeed, rot to the core.

So when I look at the men and women in Madang factories who have lost everything, I cannot help feeling so betrayed by the government I worked for. We fought the cause for our people in every major global fisheries fora. From cynical pomp ass green Caucasians, to bitchy Asians who wanted to get what the other guy got, we pushed the agenda for PNG so that NFA will go further in giving our wantoks the opportunity to partake in these relationships. But instead they have squandered the money for themselves and continue to fight for the Filipinos.

But if there is any comfort I have is that fish, unlike cancer are mostly highly migratory species. They travel extensively in packs and traverse the oceans for suitable spawning grounds or condusive environments to habitat. There is a new breed of PNGns swimming against the current of corruption and as they see the filth and decomposition of what the NFA has become, they are eager to change it. From the managers, officers to the analysists, keep up the fight guys. For those of you that still wear the blue shirt or blouse with the fish tick and fighting the fight, God is on your side. May he give you the courage and wisdom that when you turn your computers on today at 11 Floor Deloittes, you see the 4 million men and women that lean on you for survival. For it was because of them, the NFA was created.

Wednesday, 4 August 2010

ARTHUR GROOMED TO TAKE OVER AS PM, POLYE NOW A WINDOW DRESSER....

PRIME Minister Sir Michael Somare has abrogated the National Alliance constitution to hand power over to his son.
While the heat is on for Sir Michael to step aside and allow his deputy Don Polye to take over the top job, a ploy has also been engineered to dismantle the support of the National Alliance Highlands bloc for the latter.
With the Minj national convention now deferred, concerns have been raised that Mr Polye is being marginalised while Sir Michael makes it conducive for his son to take over the top job.
NA party president Simon Kaiwi has said the postponement was a result of recent political events and its implications on the party while Mr Polye reaffirmed his commitment to Sir Michael and the party yesterday.
“As far as I know, the position of the NA leadership is filled and there is no vacancy.
“The leader is currently Sir Michael and I totally support his leadership,” Mr Polye said.
Cracks have emerged within the ruling party as late as the appointment of eight new ministries following the failed attempt by the Opposition to move a vote of no confidence.
Mr Polye who was poised to wrestle the leadership from Sir Michael at the convention reportedly only announced a reshuffle as acting prime minister two weeks ago which the Prime Minister had already signed before heading to Fiji with Foreign Minister Sam Abal.
A meeting held reportedly in Cairns last Sunday between State Enterprises Minister Arthur Somare, Treasurer Peter O’Neill, Southern Highlands Governor Anderson Agiru, Enga Governor Peter Ipatas and Foreign Affairs, Trade and Immigrations Minister Sam Abal was to dismantle Mr Polye’s support.
Two top government officials (named) said support for Mr Polye to take the leadership of NA was imminent as members were already fed up with the Chief.
“That meeting and other meetings of similar nature was a ploy to divide the support of Mr Polye in the Highlands bloc,” one of them said.
They said it was unfortunate that the Minj convention had been put off to avert Sir Michael’s possible ouster but the National Alliance caucus can now ask Sir Michael Somare to step down.
It is understood the pressure is on Sir Michael to step down voluntarily and allow Mr Polye to assume the leadership of the party and lead it into the next election.

SOURCE: SOUTH PACIFIC POST

MORE ANSWERS THAN JUST GUNS

OP/ED

THE Port Moresby-based police inspector whose gun was used by a security guard to create panic on a business city thoroughfare has more than the gun to answer for.
He has to answer to his commissioner, the Department of Personnel Management and to the Ombudsman Commission on what he was doing running a security company while he remained a senior member of the disciplined forces and a senior government employee.
Stern rules bind the public servant to his employer, the state.
The Public Service (Management) Act, section 76, prohibits any engagement in outside employment or
business or in acquisition of land by any member of the national public service.
The public service General Orders supports this provision at GO no.20, which specifies the areas where civil servants cannot engage in outside businesses or employment and other miscellaneous conducts which are improper. Failure to observe these orders would most normally attract the full rigours of the public service disciplinary process.
Special conditions do apply, but permission has to be granted by the secretary of personnel management and, normally, this permission can be withdrawn at any time.
While the leadership code does not cover all public servants, those who occupy constitutional offices or are above a certain rank in the public service hierarchy, are covered by the code.
For those public servants who are covered by the leadership code, section 7 prohibits directorship in any company, section 8 prohibits shareholding in any company and section 9 prohibits employment by any other employer.
Special conditions also apply but they have to be discussed with and would have to be approved by the Ombudsman Commission or other competent authorities specified under the law.
This is a proviso that was once very strictly observed but is, today, widely abused and there would appear to be very little enforcement of the relevant laws and regulations cited above.
The police inspector, who was last week detained by his colleagues, is not alone in his adventurism.
There are civil servants, including departmental heads, who own and operate businesses in many parts of the country.
Isaac Lupari, as chief secretary, once denounced profiteering public servants who were bleeding their compatriot dry with numerous money loan schemes right under the noses of the public service.
These officers, many of whom continue to operate today, work in departments in some senior capacity or other and then arrange through pay deductions through the pay office for collection of their dues each fortnight.
We do not think the secretary for personnel management or the Ombudsman Commission (if the officers are covered by the leadership code) would ever give permission for these kinds of businesses to be conducted.
Others operate passenger motor vehicle services or trade stores or even in the building and construction and earthmoving services.
Why these public servants have never been prosecuted we shall never know.
Such is the extent to which the Public Service (Management) Act, the public service General Orders and the leadership code have been abused that bringing it back to any sort of equilibrium will take nothing short of an operation under emergency powers.
But, everything begins at the top. Ever since that fateful day on March 3, 1978, when Sir Michael Somare and Fr (now Mr) John Momis announced to a shocked parliament that the leadership code would be effected and all leaders with business dealings were asked to reveal their assets and accounts to the Ombudsman Commission, there has been a silent rebellion against the law.
That first announcement led to the walkout of parliament by businessmen-cum-politicians Sir Iambake Okuk (deceased) and Sir Julius Chan in the first motion of no-confidence.
Ever since, it has been a downhill trend where observance of the leadership code is concerned, to the extent that now the code is under threat and with the full concurrence of Sir Michael himself, who appears to have run afoul of the code somehow.

Tuesday, 3 August 2010

Cannery sacks 400 PNG employees over pay dispute

 Australia Network News

A Philippines fish cannery in Papua New Guinea has sacked over 400 of its employees for protesting against its failure to pay a wage rate of a dollar an hour. In 2009 PNG's Minimum Wages Board set its new wage rate at a dollar an hour. All employers were to pay the rate starting this year.
PNG's Employers Federation says the RD Tuna cannery did not receive an exemption from the Department of Labour.The federation says therefore the company should pay the minim wage rate of a dollar an hour.

RD Tuna applied for exemptions under the agriculture sector despite being an employer in the fisheries sector. The company's management says it will not implement the new wage rate until the Department of Labour makes a ruling.
In March, PNG's Department of Labour advised companies which did not receive exemptions to implement the new wage rate.

The Employers Federation has accused the Department of Labour of failing to inform companies individually. The RD Tuna cannery has reportedly reinstated half of the 400 plus employees, mostly women, it sacked last week.

Monday, 2 August 2010

Papua New Guinea Apologizes for CEDAW Record

Regina Varolli

UNITED NATIONS, NEW YORK, Papua New Guinea came to New York in July to face a U.N. inspection of its recent record on women's rights. A critical panel highlighted murders of women accused of sorcery and witchcraft and the chair of the delegation apologized for the country's poor record.

Papua New Guinea--one of the few countries in the world where women's life expectancy is lower than men's--ratified a major U.N. women's rights treaty in 1995, but then proceeded to miss four deadlines for reporting on its compliance with key provisions.

When the delegation from the half-island nation in the southwest Pacific appeared in New York in late July it turned out to be the first encounter with the review committee on the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, CEDAW. The committee was reviewing status reports from six other countries during its 46th session from July 12-30.

The meeting was housed in the temporary home of the U.N. headquarters, located on New York City's East River, during a remodel of the main U.N. building.

Seated on a raised platform in the large conference room, Carol Kidu, the chairwoman of the Papua New Guinea delegation, and NaƩla Gabr, the CEDAW committee chairwoman, faced the 23 members of the CEDAW committee. First the committee read questions aloud, after which the delegation chair responded. Then the floor was turned over to 15 delegates representing various branches of the Papua New Guinea civil service, who delivered their responses.

A key concern of committee members was what the government was doing to stop the murders of women accused of sorcery and witchcraft.

"Research is being done on the emergence of killings of so-called witches and on the sudden increase of identifying women at the village level as witches and killing them," Kidu, also Papua New Guinea's minister for community development, told the committee. "We have no data on sorcery and we have no data on the number of people who have been arrested for killings or practicing sorcery, or those who have gone to prison."

Silence Fills the Room

When Gabr, chair of the review committee, asked the rest of the country's delegation if they had anything to add to Kidu's comments about the government's response to the killings, silence filled the room.

Press accounts have found 50 women killed in 2009 for sorcery and witchcraft and Papua New Guinea's status report to the committee states that these killings have doubled in recent times.

Recent reports from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have both expressed grave concerns over the practice of witch hunting and the brutalization of women by the country's many tribes in one of the world's most culturally remote countries, where the mainly rural population practices subsistence-based agriculture. The reports indicate that heavily-armed tribal villagers sometimes drive off police who have come to investigate reports of sorcery-motivated murders.

These murders may be linked to a worsening HIV-AIDS epidemic. In Papua New Guinea--with a population of 6.5 million and a literacy rate of 62 percent--AIDS is widely viewed as the result of black magic by witches and sorcerers rather than a modern disease that must be treated with modern medicine, members of the CEDAW committee said.

Sunday, 1 August 2010

Nape’s undemocratic parliament equals Somare’s absolute power

BY SAM BASIL MP

The National Parliament Speaker Hon. Jeffery Nape has eroded the spirit of democracy for three consecutive years as the speaker of this eight parliament and continues to do.

Since becoming a member of this eight parliament I was given a copy of the constitution the edited version July, 2007 and started browsing through the speakers role and responsibilities when I first started to realise the unprofessional and undemocratic conducts that he posses.

The constitution stated clearly in Section 108 (1) that, The Speaker is responsible, subject to and in accordance with the Constitutional Laws, the Acts of Parliament and the Standing Orders of the Parliament, for upholding the dignity of the Parliament, maintaining order in it, regulating its proceedings and administering its affairs, and for controlling the precincts of the Parliament as defined by or under an Act of the Parliament.

The Speaker Hon. Jeffery Nape’s decisions and actions so far on the floor of Parliament have clearly shown that he is irresponsible and his conducts were not subjected to as in accordance with the Constitutional Laws, the Act of Parliament and the Standing Orders of the Parliament. Simply there is no more democratic process in the proceedings of parliament.

In the last sitting of Parliament the speaker; A) Failed to entertain the motion of no confidence notice which was officially handed to the speaker’s office at 0930hrs on the 21.07.10.

B) Failed to entertain the Noes call by the opposition followed by division call which was seconded against the leader of government business who proposed that the parliament at its rising be adjourned till November 16 2010.

C) Failed yet again to entertain the Noes call by the opposition followed by division call which was seconded against the leader of government business who proposed again that the parliament is now adjourned until November 16 2010.

Surprisingly the parliament clerk Mr Don Pandan has excluded the division calls from the copies of Hansard distributed a week after the session. The National Parliament clerk has also failed his constitutional duties to properly advice the speaker to act in accordance with the constitutional laws, the Acts of Parliament and the Standing Orders of the Parliament and he must also be referred to the Ombudsman Commission.

We have heard that during the intense lobbying two very influential government Mps spent three hours with the speaker. The speaker’s undemocratic rulings on the floor that week also raises many questions regarding the integrity of the chair.

Is the speaker above the law? Why haven’t the relevant authorities stepped in to address all the corruption claims against the speaker including his undemocratic conduct on the chair beginning from the 7th and into this 8th Parliament?

If the speaker is clearly above the law then he can be termed as the most powerful mp on the floor which means that if he decides to market his rulings to the highest bidder then he can break all the laws under the sun to do so.

Last week denial of the opposition’s rights to call for the division has seen the speaker’s office denying the rights of almost 3 million people that those 45 members of parliament represent in the opposition. If the speaker of the National Parliament is marketing his rulings on the floor then he must come clear to the 6.5m people of this nation.

Maybe it is time now for the ordinary people to directly vote a speaker of Parliament into office who can be independent from political influences the candidates must go through a series of stringent screening process and criteria with educational qualifications and most importantly ex convict and criminals should be excluded from day one.

I will also take to the ordinary grassroots people to explain the speaker’s conducts on the floor while he will be called to open forums to explain his undemocratic conducts there is no hope anymore for us the elected Mps to exercise our rights and freedom on the floor on behalf of our people.